Over 0–100 km/h, M8 Competition Coupe F92 wins (3,17 s vs 3,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M8 Competition Coupe F92 | iX M60 I20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,17 s−0,54 s | 3,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,04 s−0,90 s | 11,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,15 s−1,70 s | 21,85 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,04 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,26 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M8 Competition Coupe F92 | iX M60 I20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 0,93 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,61 s | 1,54 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,52 s | 2,67 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,17 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,98 s | 5,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,51 s | 8,60 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,26 s | 13,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,04 s | 11,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,15 s | 21,85 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
Off the line, the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe hits 100 km/h in 3.18 s versus 3.72 s for the iX M60. Despite lacking instant torque, 625 hp of power compensates. The 0.54 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe is doing 169 km/h against 151 km/h for the iX M60. The gap is 0.50 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe crosses the line in 11.04 s versus 11.94 s. The 0.90 s gap represents roughly 46 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 232 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe finishes in 20.15 s versus 21.84 s, with a 1.69 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe and the iX M60 are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.80 seconds. The 0.54 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M8 Competition Coupe F92 wins (3,17 s vs 3,71 s).
M8 Competition Coupe F92 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,17 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M8 Competition Coupe F92: 625 hp, ratio 3,04 kg/hp. iX M60 I20: 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp.
M8 Competition Coupe F92: 250 km/h. iX M60 I20: 250 km/h.