Over 0–100 km/h, Kuga EcoBoost 150 wins (9,69 s vs 9,87 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Kuga EcoBoost 150 | X1 sDrive18i F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 9,69 s−0,18 s | 9,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,21 s−0,12 s | 17,33 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,30 s | 31,09 s+0,21 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 202 km/h | 205 km/h−3 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,71 kg/hp | 10,14 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Kuga EcoBoost 150 | X1 sDrive18i F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,30 s | 2,50 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,54 s | 4,18 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,86 s | 7,18 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 9,69 s | 9,87 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 13,85 s | 13,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 26,92 s | 24,95 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 84,32 s | 61,17 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,21 s | 17,33 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,30 s | 31,09 s |
| Top speed | 202 km/h | 205 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 607 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 420 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 hits 100 km/h in 9.69 s versus 9.87 s for the X1 sDrive18i. At this point, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 leads by 0.18 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 is doing 107 km/h against 110 km/h for the X1 sDrive18i. The gap is 0.25 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 crosses the line in 17.21 s versus 17.33 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 202 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed - the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 202 km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the X1 sDrive18i finishes in 31.09 s versus 31.29 s. The 0.20 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 205 km/h, the X1 sDrive18i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.71 kg/hp vs 10.14 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.19 seconds. The 0.18 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Kuga EcoBoost 150 wins (9,69 s vs 9,87 s).
Kuga EcoBoost 150 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 9,69 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Kuga EcoBoost 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,71 kg/hp. X1 sDrive18i F48: 140 hp, ratio 10,14 kg/hp.
Kuga EcoBoost 150: 202 km/h. X1 sDrive18i F48: 205 km/h.