BMW X1 sDrive18i
140 hp, 9,7 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X1 sDrive18i ranks 14th of 30 in Combined consumption, 21th of 26 in Tank range, 25th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 140 hp
- 220 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.7 s
- VMax 205 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.8 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 3 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,499 cm³
- Power
- 140 hp
- Couple
- 220 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.8 L/100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,7 s
- VMax
- 205 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,439 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,821 mm
- Height
- 1,598 mm
- Boot
- 505 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,420 kg
- Cd
- 0.28
- CO₂ WLTP
- 132 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 C-SUV, the X1 sDrive18i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.8 L/100 L/100 (14th of 30 in Combined consumption)
The X1 sDrive18i consumes 5.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 879 km (21th of 26 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X1 sDrive18i covers 879 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the X1 sDrive18i stands against C-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X1 F48 range
Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F48
Popular duels involving the X1 sDrive18i
Continue with the BMW X1 sDrive18i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X1 sDrive18i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X1 sDrive18i rank in its segment?
Among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X1 sDrive18i ranks 14th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 21th of 26 in Tank range (879 km, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 25th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
What is the range of the X1 sDrive18i?
879 km on a full tank (5.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 21th of 26 in Tank range.
How much does the X1 sDrive18i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X1 xDrive18d instead?
The BMW X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 sDrive18i vs BMW X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.