Over 0–100 km/h, X2 xDrive20i F39 wins (7,84 s vs 9,16 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X2 xDrive20i F39 | Q3 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,84 s−1,32 s | 9,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,73 s−1,20 s | 16,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,75 s−2,10 s | 30,85 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 221 km/h+12 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,02 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X2 xDrive20i F39 | Q3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,66 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,90 s | 3,65 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,48 s | 6,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,84 s | 9,16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,89 s | 13,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,94 s | 25,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 40,05 s | 54,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,73 s | 16,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,75 s | 30,85 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 560 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the X2 xDrive20i hits 100 km/h in 7.84 s versus 9.16 s for the Q3 SUV. At this point, the X2 xDrive20i leads by 1.32 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X2 xDrive20i is doing 116 km/h against 111 km/h for the Q3 SUV. The gap is 0.80 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X2 xDrive20i crosses the line in 15.73 s versus 16.93 s. The 1.20 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X2 xDrive20i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 162 km/h versus 151 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X2 xDrive20i finishes in 28.74 s versus 30.84 s, with a 2.10 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (221 vs 209 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The X2 xDrive20i features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Q3 SUV’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X2 xDrive20i is capped at 224 km/h, the Q3 SUV at 209 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.02 kg/hp vs 10.40 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.01 seconds. The 1.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X2 xDrive20i F39 wins (7,84 s vs 9,16 s).
X2 xDrive20i F39 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,84 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X2 xDrive20i F39: 192 hp, ratio 8,02 kg/hp. Q3 SUV: 150 hp, ratio 10,40 kg/hp.
X2 xDrive20i F39: 221 km/h. Q3 SUV: 209 km/h.