Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AX3PetrolvsBScenicBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX3 · Scenic

BMW X3 M40i G01 vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

family SUV · 2021 vs 2024 · Methodology
BMWPetrolFaster

X3 M40i G01

360 hp · 500 Nm · 1,870 kg · 2021

VS
RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

218 hp · 300 Nm · 1,989 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW X3 M40i G01

4.74 s

Gap3.32 sin favour of X3 M40i
BRenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

8.05 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX3 M40i G01Scenic E-Tech Electric 220Gap
0–100 km/h4.74 s8.05 s3.32 s · X3 M40i G01
400 m standing start12.98 s16.06 s3.08 s · X3 M40i G01
1,000 m standing start23.62 s28.98 s5.36 s · X3 M40i G01
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h233 km/h17 km/h · X3 M40i G01
Power-to-weight ratio5.19 kg/hp9.12 kg/hpbetter ratio · X3 M40i G01

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWPetrolX3 M40i G01
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultBEVScenic E-Tech Electric 220
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageX3 M40i G01Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
0–30 km/h1.26 s2.24 s
0–50 km/h2.08 s3.75 s
0–80 km/h3.49 s6.07 s
0–100 km/h4.74 s8.05 s
0–120 km/h6.30 s10.66 s
0–160 km/h10.59 s19.80 s
0–200 km/h17.32 s38.38 s
400 m standing start12.98 s16.06 s
1,000 m standing start23.62 s28.98 s
Top speed limited250 km/h233 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

X3 M40i G01

5,19kg/hpratio better by 3,93 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power360 hp6 cyl
Torque500 Nm
Weight1 870 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic
Renault

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

9,12kg/hpcompensated by −119 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power218 hpPending
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 989 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the X3 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.74 s versus 8.05 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. Despite lacking instant torque, 360 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X3 M40i leads by 3.32 s and sits roughly 30 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X3 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 2.22 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the X3 M40i crosses the line in 12.98 s versus 16.06 s. The 3.08 s gap represents roughly 120 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the X3 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 163 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 M40i finishes in 23.62 s versus 28.98 s, with a 5.36 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The X3 M40i features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the X3 M40i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.36 seconds. The 3.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSPorsche

X3 M40i vs Macan GTS

RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

BMWVSPorsche

X3 M40i vs Macan GTS

RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 8,05 s).

X3 M40i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,74 seconds (calibrated simulation).

X3 M40i G01: 360 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp.

X3 M40i G01: 250 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 233 km/h.