Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M Competition G02 gagne (4,13 s vs 4,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X4 M Competition G02 | Cayenne GTS Coupe E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,13 s−0,22 s | 4,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,22 s−0,42 s | 12,64 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,35 s−0,99 s | 23,34 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 266 km/h−16 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,86 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X4 M Competition G02 | Cayenne GTS Coupe E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,07 s | 0,93 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 1,57 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,96 s | 3,00 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,13 s | 4,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,38 s | 5,91 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,98 s | 10,40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,46 s | 17,17 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,22 s | 12,64 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,35 s | 23,34 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 266 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 237 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 4.13 s versus 4.35 s for the Cayenne GTS Coupe. Despite the faster sprint time, the Cayenne GTS Coupe is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M Competition is doing 151 km/h against 142 km/h for the Cayenne GTS Coupe. The gap is 0.16 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M Competition crosses the line in 12.22 s versus 12.64 s. The 0.42 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 207 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M Competition finishes in 22.35 s versus 23.34 s, with a 0.99 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (266 km/h), the Cayenne GTS Coupe never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X4 M Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne GTS Coupe at 270 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 4.86 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.90 seconds. The 0.22 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M Competition G02 gagne (4,13 s vs 4,35 s).
X4 M Competition G02 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,13 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X4 M Competition G02 : 510 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. Cayenne GTS Coupe E3.1 : 460 hp, ratio 4,86 kg/hp.
X4 M Competition G02 : 250 km/h. Cayenne GTS Coupe E3.1 : 266 km/h.