Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 and S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version W223 are neck and neck (5,13 s vs 5,15 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M50d F15 | S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version W223 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 5,13 s+0,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 13,34 s+0,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 24,11 s+0,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,14 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M50d F15 | S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version W223 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,05 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,71 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 5,13 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,95 s | 6,98 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 11,91 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,34 s | 18,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 13,34 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 24,11 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 255 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version hits 100 km/h in 5.13 s versus 5.15 s for the X5 M50d. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version is doing 135 km/h against 136 km/h for the X5 M50d. The gap is 0.14 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version crosses the line in 13.33 s versus 13.47 s. The 0.14 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 194 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version finishes in 24.11 s versus 24.60 s, with a 0.49 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the X5 M50d and the S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.69 kg/hp vs 6.14 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 and S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version W223 are neck and neck (5,13 s vs 5,15 s, no significant gap).
X5 M50d F15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp. S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version W223: 367 hp, ratio 6,14 kg/hp.
X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h. S 450 d 4MATIC Saloon, long version W223: 250 km/h.