Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AX5vsBCayennePetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX5 · Cayenne

BMW X5 M50i G05 vs Porsche Cayenne S: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2019 vs 2019 · Methodology
BMWPetrolFaster

X5 M50i G05

530 hp · 750 Nm · 2,250 kg · 2019

VS
PorschePetrol

Cayenne S

440 hp · 550 Nm · 2,020 kg · 2019

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW X5 M50i G05

4.34 s

Gap0.29 sin favour of X5 M50i
BPorsche Cayenne S

4.63 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX5 M50i G05Cayenne SGap
0–100 km/h4.34 s4.63 s0.29 s · X5 M50i G05
400 m standing start12.43 s12.79 s0.36 s · X5 M50i G05
1,000 m standing start22.51 s23.26 s0.75 s · X5 M50i G05
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h264 km/h14 km/h · Cayenne S
Power-to-weight ratio4.25 kg/hp4.59 kg/hpbetter ratio · X5 M50i G05

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWPetrolX5 M50i G05
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
PorschePetrolCayenne S
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageX5 M50i G05Cayenne S
0–30 km/h1.23 s1.22 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h2.03 s · tight gap2.04 s
0–80 km/h3.29 s · tight gap3.38 s
0–100 km/h4.34 s4.63 s
0–120 km/h5.63 s6.04 s
0–160 km/h9.15 s10.10 s
0–200 km/h14.54 s16.21 s
400 m standing start12.43 s12.79 s
1,000 m standing start22.51 s23.26 s
Top speed limited250 km/h264 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

X5 M50i G05

4,25kg/hpratio better by 0,35 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power530 hpPending
Torque750 Nm
Weight2 250 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
GearboxEight-speed Steptronic transmission
Porsche

Cayenne S

4,59kg/hpcompensated by −230 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power440 hpV6
Torque550 Nm
Weight2 020 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxTORQUE_CONVERTER

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the X5 M50i hits 100 km/h in 4.34 s versus 4.64 s for the Cayenne S. At this point, the X5 M50i leads by 0.29 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X5 M50i is doing 150 km/h against 145 km/h for the Cayenne S. The gap is 0.19 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the X5 M50i crosses the line in 12.43 s versus 12.79 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the X5 M50i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 202 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X5 M50i finishes in 22.50 s versus 23.26 s, with a 0.76 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 264 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X5 M50i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne S at 264 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.25 kg/hp vs 4.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.94 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of X5 M50i G05
Audi SQ7 SUVAudi SQ7 SUV
Instead of Cayenne S
Porsche Cayenne Turbo SPorsche Cayenne TurboPorsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSPorsche

X5 M50i vs Cayenne Turbo

AudiVSPorsche

SQ7 SUV vs Cayenne S

BMWVSPorsche

X5 M50i vs Cayenne Turbo

AudiVSPorsche

SQ7 SUV vs Cayenne S

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50i G05 wins (4,34 s vs 4,63 s).

X5 M50i G05 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,34 seconds (calibrated simulation).

X5 M50i G05: 530 hp, ratio 4,25 kg/hp. Cayenne S: 440 hp, ratio 4,59 kg/hp.

X5 M50i G05: 250 km/h. Cayenne S: 264 km/h.