Over 0–100 km/h, XM 50e G09 wins (5,19 s vs 6,08 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | XM 50e G09 | i4 eDrive35 G26 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.19 s | 6.08 s | 0.89 s · XM 50e G09 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.44 s | 14.38 s | 0.94 s · XM 50e G09 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.30 s | 26.26 s | 1.96 s · XM 50e G09 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 190 km/h | 60 km/h · XM 50e G09 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.50 kg/hp | 6.99 kg/hp | better ratio · XM 50e G09 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | XM 50e G09 | i4 eDrive35 G26 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.39 s | 1.69 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.33 s | 2.81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.82 s | 4.56 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.19 s | 6.08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.88 s | 8.04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.59 s | 14.28 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18.84 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13.44 s | 14.38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.30 s | 26.26 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 190 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the XM 50e hits 100 km/h in 5.19 s versus 6.08 s for the i4 eDrive35. At this point, the XM 50e leads by 0.89 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the XM 50e is doing 139 km/h against 131 km/h for the i4 eDrive35. The gap is 0.65 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the XM 50e crosses the line in 13.44 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.94 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the XM 50e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 193 km/h versus 179 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the XM 50e finishes in 24.30 s versus 26.26 s, with a 1.96 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XM 50e is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the i4 eDrive35 at 190 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.50 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.27 seconds. The 0.89 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, XM 50e G09 wins (5,19 s vs 6,08 s).
XM 50e G09 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,19 seconds (calibrated simulation).
XM 50e G09: 476 hp, ratio 5,50 kg/hp. i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
XM 50e G09: 250 km/h. i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h.