Over 0–100 km/h, Urus SE wins (3,46 s vs 5,19 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Urus SE | XM 50e G09 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.46 s | 5.19 s | 1.74 s · Urus SE |
| 400 m standing start | 11.30 s | 13.44 s | 2.14 s · Urus SE |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.49 s | 24.30 s | 3.81 s · Urus SE |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 312 km/h | 250 km/h | 62 km/h · Urus SE |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.29 kg/hp | 5.50 kg/hp | better ratio · Urus SE |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Urus SE | XM 50e G09 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.01 s | 1.39 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.69 s | 2.33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.66 s | 3.82 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.46 s | 5.19 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.42 s | 6.88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7.00 s | 11.59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10.75 s | 18.84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.30 s | 13.44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.49 s | 24.30 s |
| Top speed limited | 312 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 653 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 900 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed torque-converter automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Urus SE hits 100 km/h in 3.46 s versus 5.19 s for the XM 50e. At this point, the Urus SE leads by 1.74 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Urus SE is doing 166 km/h against 139 km/h for the XM 50e. The gap is 1.39 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Urus SE crosses the line in 11.30 s versus 13.44 s. The 2.14 s gap represents roughly 98 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Urus SE continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 229 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Urus SE finishes in 20.49 s versus 24.30 s, with a 3.81 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Urus SE is capped at 312 km/h, the XM 50e at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.29 kg/hp vs 5.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.89 seconds. The 1.74 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Urus SE wins (3,46 s vs 5,19 s).
Urus SE goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,46 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Urus SE: 653 hp, ratio 3,29 kg/hp. XM 50e G09: 476 hp, ratio 5,50 kg/hp.
Urus SE: 312 km/h. XM 50e G09: 250 km/h.