Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.3 wins (4,73 s vs 5,19 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XM 50e G09 | Macan S 95B.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,19 s | 4,73 s+0,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,44 s | 12,97 s+0,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,30 s | 23,67 s+0,63 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 259 km/h−9 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,50 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,68 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XM 50e G09 | Macan S 95B.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,39 s | 1,21 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,33 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,82 s | 3,41 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,19 s | 4,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,88 s | 6,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,59 s | 10,65 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,84 s | 17,56 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,44 s | 12,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,30 s | 23,67 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 259 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Macan S hits 100 km/h in 4.73 s versus 5.19 s for the Bmw XM 50e. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Macan S leads by 0.46 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan S is doing 142 km/h against 139 km/h for the Bmw XM 50e. The gap is 0.36 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan S crosses the line in 12.97 s versus 13.44 s. The 0.47 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Macan S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan S finishes in 23.67 s versus 24.30 s, with a 0.63 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 259 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw XM 50e is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Macan S at 259 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.89 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.3 wins (4,73 s vs 5,19 s).
XM 50e G09 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,19 seconds (calibrated simulation).
XM 50e G09: 476 hp, ratio 5,50 kg/hp. Macan S 95B.3: 340 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp.
XM 50e G09: 250 km/h. Macan S 95B.3: 259 km/h.