Over 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range wins (7,41 s vs 7,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Han EV 200kW 2WD | Atto 3 Extended Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 7,41 s+0,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 15,57 s+0,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s−0,99 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h+20 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Han EV 200kW 2WD | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,20 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,68 s | 3,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,92 s | 5,43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 7,41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,11 s | 10,03 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,24 s | 19,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Atto 3 Extended Range hits 100 km/h in 7.41 s versus 7.76 s for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. At this point, the Atto 3 Extended Range leads by 0.35 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range is doing 121 km/h against 123 km/h for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. The gap is 0.31 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Atto 3 Extended Range crosses the line in 15.57 s versus 15.74 s. The 0.17 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Atto 3 Extended Range maxes out at 160 km/h while the Han EV 200kW 2WD keeps accelerating towards 180 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 576 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Han EV 200kW 2WD overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD finishes in 28.20 s versus 29.19 s. The 0.99 s delta in favour of the Han EV 200kW 2WD shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Han EV 200kW 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.76 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 0.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range wins (7,41 s vs 7,76 s).
Han EV 200kW 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Han EV 200kW 2WD: 272 hp, ratio 7,76 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range: 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
Han EV 200kW 2WD: 180 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range: 160 km/h.