Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,76 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Han EV 200kW 2WD | 4 Long Range RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 6,73 s+1,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 14,92 s+0,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s | 27,24 s+0,97 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,76 kg/hp | 7,00 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Han EV 200kW 2WD | 4 Long Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,20 s | 1,92 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,68 s | 3,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,92 s | 5,16 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 6,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,11 s | 8,78 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,24 s | 15,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 14,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s | 27,24 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the 4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 7.76 s for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. At this point, the 4 Long Range RWD leads by 1.03 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 123 km/h for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. The gap is 0.64 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.74 s. The 0.83 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 28.20 s, with a 0.97 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 180 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Han EV 200kW 2WD and the 4 Long Range RWD are governed to 180 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.76 kg/hp vs 7.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.56 seconds. The 1.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,76 s).
Han EV 200kW 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Han EV 200kW 2WD: 272 hp, ratio 7,76 kg/hp. 4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp.
Han EV 200kW 2WD: 180 km/h. 4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h.