Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,29 s vs 9,33 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 Performance | Seal U 160kW 2WD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,29 s−6,04 s | 9,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,49 s−5,52 s | 17,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,21 s−9,53 s | 30,74 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+101 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,15 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 Performance | Seal U 160kW 2WD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 2,64 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,49 s | 4,41 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,44 s | 7,12 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,29 s | 9,33 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,37 s | 12,22 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,66 s | 21,65 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,53 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11,49 s | 17,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,21 s | 30,74 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 698 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 836 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.29 s versus 9.33 s for the Seal U 160kW 2WD. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 6.04 s and sits roughly 32 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 157 km/h against 115 km/h for the Seal U 160kW 2WD. The gap is 4.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.49 s versus 17.01 s. The 5.52 s gap represents roughly 200 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 21.21 s versus 30.73 s, with a 9.53 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the Seal U 160kW 2WD at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.03 kg/hp vs 9.15 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.04 seconds. The 6.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,29 s vs 9,33 s).
Model 3 Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model 3 Performance: 456 hp, ratio 4,03 kg/hp. Seal U 160kW 2WD: 218 hp, ratio 9,15 kg/hp.
Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h. Seal U 160kW 2WD: 160 km/h.