Among the 17 saloons electric 2021–2025, the Seal U 160kW 2WD ranks 15th of 16 in WLTP range (420 km, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD), 17th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (9.5 s, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD).
I · GENERATION 2023 → · SALOON
BYDBEV
Seal U 160kW 2WD
218 hp, 420 km range, 9,5 s 0-100 : among the 17 saloons electric 2021–2025, the Seal U 160kW 2WD ranks 15th of 16 in WLTP range, 17th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
218hp
310 Nm · 218 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
9.5s
VMax 160 km/h
Range
420km
WLTP
DC charging
—kW
Technical identity card
Full specifications BYD Seal U 160kW 2WD
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 218 hp |
| Combined power | 218 hp |
| Couple | 310 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 80 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 420 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 17.0 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,5 s |
| VMax | 160 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,995 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 17 saloons electric, the Seal U 160kW 2WD ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (1st with 830 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD (1st with 2.0 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 420 km WLTP (15th of 16 in WLTP range)
The Seal U 160kW 2WD offers 420 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (830 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Segment positioning
Where the Seal U 160kW 2WD stands against saloons electric
Comparison across 17 saloons electric marketed between 2021–2025.
WLTP range15e / 16
420 km
Min 406 km · Bmw i4 eDrive35Max 830 km · Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD
0–100 km/h17e / 17
9,5 s
Min 9,5 s · BYD Seal U 160kW 2WDMax 2,0 s · Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Model 3 Standard Range Plus227 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Model 3 Long Range RWD258 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
P7263 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
Model 3 RWD282 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Seal U 160kW 2WD
Frequently asked questions
BYD Seal U 160kW 2WD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
420 km WLTP announced — making it the 15th of 16 in autonomie du segment out of 16 models. The reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (830 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD leads in WLTP range (830 km vs 420 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Seal U 160kW 2WD vs Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.