Over 0–100 km/h, 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 wins (7,76 s vs 9,71 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 | 116 F70 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7.76 s | 9.71 s | 1.95 s · 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 |
| 400 m standing start | 15.61 s | 16.88 s | 1.27 s · 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.41 s | 31.31 s | 3.90 s · 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 206 km/h | 39 km/h · 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6.49 kg/hp | 11.39 kg/hp | better ratio · 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 | 116 F70 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.26 s | 1.56 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.79 s | 2.99 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.98 s | 6.40 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.76 s | 9.71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9.81 s | 14.10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.84 s | 28.40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26.53 s | 76.57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15.61 s | 16.88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.41 s | 31.31 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 206 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 122 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 230 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 390 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed Steptronic transmission with dual clutch |
Off the line, the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 hits 100 km/h in 7.76 s versus 9.71 s for the 116. Despite the faster sprint time, the 116 is 7 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 is doing 126 km/h against 106 km/h for the 116. The gap is 0.22 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 crosses the line in 15.61 s versus 16.88 s. The 1.27 s gap represents roughly 45 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 178 km/h versus 146 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 finishes in 27.41 s versus 31.31 s, with a 3.90 s lead.
Electronically capped at 210 km/h, the 116 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.49 kg/hp vs 11.39 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.84 seconds. The 1.95 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 wins (7,76 s vs 9,71 s).
4 PureTech 225 EAT8 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
4 PureTech 225 EAT8: 228 hp, ratio 6,49 kg/hp. 116 F70: 122 hp, ratio 11,39 kg/hp.
4 PureTech 225 EAT8: 245 km/h. 116 F70: 206 km/h.