Sur 0–100 km/h, 530e xDrive G30 gagne (5,86 s vs 5,98 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | 530e xDrive G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 5,86 s+0,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 14,21 s+0,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,38 s+0,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+3 km/h | 227 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,49 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | 530e xDrive G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,28 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 2,16 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 4,07 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 5,86 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,25 s | 8,18 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,16 s | 15,15 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,87 s | 29,61 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 14,21 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,38 stight gap |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 227 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 4 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 530e xDrive hits 100 km/h in 5.86 s versus 5.98 s for the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300. At this point, the Bmw 530e xDrive leads by 0.12 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 530e xDrive is doing 127 km/h against 127 km/h for the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The gap is 0.05 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 530e xDrive crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.27 s. The 0.06 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 530e xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 173 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 530e xDrive finishes in 26.38 s versus 26.41 s, with a 0.03 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 227 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw 530e xDrive never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.23 kg/hp vs 6.49 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.63 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 530e xDrive G30 gagne (5,86 s vs 5,98 s).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,98 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp. 530e xDrive G30 : 292 hp, ratio 6,49 kg/hp.
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 230 km/h. 530e xDrive G30 : 227 km/h.