Over 0–100 km/h, 9 E-Tense 250 wins (8,36 s vs 8,67 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 9 E-Tense 250 | A3 allstreet | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 8.67 s | 0.31 s · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 16.46 s | 0.24 s · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 29.43 s | 0.86 s · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 223 km/h | 12 km/h · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.51 kg/hp | 8.80 kg/hp | better ratio · 9 E-Tense 250 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 9 E-Tense 250 | A3 allstreet |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.40 s | 2.34 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.01 s | 3.90 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.47 s | 6.33 s · tight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 8.67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.88 s | 11.58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.12 s | 20.45 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31.70 s | 39.86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 16.46 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 29.43 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 223 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 320 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual gearbox |
Off the line, the 9 E-Tense 250 hits 100 km/h in 8.36 s versus 8.67 s for the A3 allstreet. The instant torque of 520 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the A3 allstreet is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 9 E-Tense 250 is doing 121 km/h against 116 km/h for the A3 allstreet. The gap is 0.01 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 9 E-Tense 250 crosses the line in 16.22 s versus 16.46 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the 9 E-Tense 250 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 170 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 9 E-Tense 250 finishes in 28.57 s versus 29.42 s, with a 0.86 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (235 vs 223 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.35 seconds. The 0.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 9 E-Tense 250 wins (8,36 s vs 8,67 s).
9 E-Tense 250 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. A3 allstreet: 150 hp, ratio 8,80 kg/hp.
9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h. A3 allstreet: 223 km/h.