Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 200 Saloon wins (8,09 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS9 E-Tense 250 | CLA 200 Saloon | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 8,09 s+0,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,93 s+0,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s−0,17 s | 28,74 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+3 km/h | 232 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,27 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS9 E-Tense 250 | CLA 200 Saloon |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,40 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,01 s | 3,13 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,47 s | 5,68 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 8,09 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,88 s | 11,03 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 19,52 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,70 s | 33,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 28,74 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 232 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 330 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 705 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the CLA 200 Saloon hits 100 km/h in 8.09 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 184 hp of power compensates. At this point, the CLA 200 Saloon leads by 0.27 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the CLA 200 Saloon is doing 116 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 0.53 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the CLA 200 Saloon crosses the line in 15.93 s versus 16.22 s. The 0.29 s gap represents roughly 12 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 232 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed - the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 232 km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the DS9 E-Tense 250 finishes in 28.57 s versus 28.73 s. The 0.17 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 232 km/h, the CLA 200 Saloon never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.89 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 200 Saloon wins (8,09 s vs 8,36 s).
DS9 E-Tense 250 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
DS9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. CLA 200 Saloon: 184 hp, ratio 9,27 kg/hp.
DS9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h. CLA 200 Saloon: 232 km/h.