Sur 0–100 km/h, CLA 220 Saloon gagne (7,31 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS9 E-Tense 250 | CLA 220 Saloon | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 7,31 s+1,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,32 s+0,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 27,54 s+1,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 240 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,08 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS9 E-Tense 250 | CLA 220 Saloon |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,40 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,01 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,47 s | 5,21 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 7,31 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,88 s | 9,81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 16,96 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,70 s | 28,48 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 380 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 705 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the CLA 220 Saloon hits 100 km/h in 7.31 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 211 hp of power compensates. At this point, the CLA 220 Saloon leads by 1.05 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the CLA 220 Saloon is doing 122 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 0.89 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the CLA 220 Saloon crosses the line in 15.32 s versus 16.22 s. The 0.90 s gap represents roughly 37 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the CLA 220 Saloon continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 171 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the CLA 220 Saloon finishes in 27.53 s versus 28.57 s, with a 1.03 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (235 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the CLA 220 Saloon never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 1.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, CLA 220 Saloon gagne (7,31 s vs 8,36 s).
DS9 E-Tense 250 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,36 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. CLA 220 Saloon : 211 hp, ratio 8,08 kg/hp.
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h. CLA 220 Saloon : 240 km/h.