2025 · GENERATION 2025 · COMPACT
MercedesMHEV

CLA 220 Saloon

211 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 13 compacts hybrid 2023–2027, the CLA 220 Saloon ranks 5th of 13 in Combined consumption, 11th of 13 in Tank range, 4th of 13 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,66715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

211hp

380 Nm · 30 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

7.2s

VMax 240 km/h

Cons.

5.5L

/100 km

Tank

43L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Mercedes CLA 220 Saloon

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,499 cm³
Puissance électrique30 hp
Combined power211 hp
Couple380 Nm
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.5 L/100km
Tank43 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,2 s
VMax240 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,723 mm
Wheelbase2,790 mm
Width1,855 mm
Height1,450 mm
Boot405 L
Kerb weight1,705 kg
CO₂ WLTP124 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 13 compacts hybrid, the CLA 220 Saloon ranks (top 5 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 5th of 13 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100), 4th of 13 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Mercedes CLA 180 Limousine (1st with 5.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine (1st with 895 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (5th of 13 in Combined consumption)

The CLA 220 Saloon consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Mercedes CLA 180 Limousine (5.4 L/100).

Tank range: 782 km (11th of 13 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the CLA 220 Saloon covers 782 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 895 km.

Segment positioning

Where the CLA 220 Saloon stands against compacts hybrid

Comparison across 13 compacts hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.

Combined consumption5e / 13
5.5 L/100
Min 6.4 L/100 · Bmw 123 xDriveMax 5.4 L/100 · Mercedes CLA 180 Limousine
Tank range11e / 13
782 km
Min 766 km · Bmw 123 xDriveMax 895 km · Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine
0–100 km/h4e / 13
7,2 s
Min 9,9 s · Audi A3 Sportback TFSI S tronic 85 kW MHEVMax 6,3 s · Bmw 123 xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Mercedes CLA range

Other versions

Compare

Popular duels involving the CLA 220 Saloon

Frequently asked questions

Mercedes CLA 220 Saloon: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 13 compacts hybrid 2023–2027, the CLA 220 Saloon ranks 5th of 13 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Mercedes CLA 180 Limousine), 11th of 13 in Tank range (782 km, behind the Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine), 4th of 13 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the Bmw 123 xDrive).

782 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 11th of 13 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Mercedes CLA 180 Limousine leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the CLA 220 Saloon vs Mercedes CLA 180 Limousine duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.