Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AExplorerPetrolvsBClio 6Hybrid
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsExplorer · Clio 6

Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2020 vs 2025 · Methodology
FordPetrolFaster

Explorer EcoBoost 300

305 hp · 420 Nm · 2,043 kg · 2020

VS
RenaultHybrid

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

160 hp · 205 Nm · 1,370 kg · 2025

Result · 0–100 km/h

AFord Explorer EcoBoost 300

6.71 s

Gap2.02 sin favour of Explorer EcoBoost 300
BRenault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

8.73 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureExplorer EcoBoost 300Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160Gap
0–100 km/h6.71 s8.73 s2.02 s · Explorer EcoBoost 300
400 m standing start14.93 s16.40 s1.47 s · Explorer EcoBoost 300
1,000 m standing start27.10 s29.70 s2.60 s · Explorer EcoBoost 300
Top speed (electronically limited)220 km/h180 km/h40 km/h · Explorer EcoBoost 300
Power-to-weight ratio6.70 kg/hp8.56 kg/hpbetter ratio · Explorer EcoBoost 300

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

FordPetrolExplorer EcoBoost 300
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultHybridClio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageExplorer EcoBoost 300Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
0–30 km/h1.82 s2.06 s
0–50 km/h3.04 s3.45 s
0–80 km/h4.96 s6.07 s
0–100 km/h6.71 s8.73 s
0–120 km/h8.99 s11.64 s
0–160 km/h15.83 s22.08 s
0–200 km/h30.71 s-
400 m standing start14.93 s16.40 s
1,000 m standing start27.10 s29.70 s
Top speed220 km/h180 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Ford

Explorer EcoBoost 300

6,70kg/hpratio better by 1,86 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power305 hpPending
Torque420 Nm
Weight2 043 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox10-speed torque-converter automatic
Renault

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

8,56kg/hpcompensated by −673 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power160 hpE4
Torque205 Nm
Weight1 370 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxE-Tech Multi-Mode dog-clutch (ICE: 4-speed, EV: 2-speed)

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 hits 100 km/h in 6.71 s versus 8.73 s for the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160. At this point, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 leads by 2.02 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 is doing 127 km/h against 114 km/h for the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160. The gap is 0.94 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 16.39 s. The 1.47 s gap represents roughly 56 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 173 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 finishes in 27.09 s versus 29.70 s, with a 2.61 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The Explorer EcoBoost 300 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Explorer EcoBoost 300 is capped at 220 km/h, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.70 kg/hp vs 8.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.81 seconds. The 2.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

FordVSPorsche

Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Cayenne (6-speed manual)

RenaultVSPeugeot

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 vs 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6

FordVSPorsche

Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Cayenne (6-speed manual)

RenaultVSCitroen

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 vs C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Explorer EcoBoost 300 wins (6,71 s vs 8,73 s).

Explorer EcoBoost 300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Explorer EcoBoost 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp. Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: 160 hp, ratio 8,56 kg/hp.

Explorer EcoBoost 300: 220 km/h. Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: 180 km/h.