Over 0–100 km/h, Focus ST 280 wins (5,68 s vs 9,90 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Focus ST 280 | Jazz e:HEV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.68 s | 9.90 s | 4.22 s · Focus ST 280 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.80 s | 17.09 s | 3.29 s · Focus ST 280 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.64 s | 31.95 s | 7.31 s · Focus ST 280 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h | 170 km/h | 94 km/h · Focus ST 280 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.11 kg/hp | 11.18 kg/hp | better ratio · Focus ST 280 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Focus ST 280 | Jazz e:HEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.66 s · tight gap | 1.81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.77 s | 3.30 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.37 s | 6.60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.68 s | 9.90 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.28 s | 14.34 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.78 s | 34.79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19.05 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13.80 s | 17.09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.64 s | 31.95 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h | 170 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 431 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 107 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 253 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 196 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Off the line, the Focus ST 280 hits 100 km/h in 5.68 s versus 9.90 s for the Jazz e:HEV. At this point, the Focus ST 280 leads by 4.22 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Focus ST 280 is doing 139 km/h against 106 km/h for the Jazz e:HEV. The gap is 1.79 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Focus ST 280 crosses the line in 13.79 s versus 17.08 s. The 3.29 s gap represents roughly 113 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Focus ST 280 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 194 km/h versus 142 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Focus ST 280 finishes in 24.63 s versus 31.95 s, with a 7.31 s lead.
Electronically capped at 170 km/h, the Jazz e:HEV never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.11 kg/hp vs 11.18 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.33 seconds. The 4.22 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Focus ST 280 wins (5,68 s vs 9,90 s).
Focus ST 280 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,68 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Focus ST 280: 280 hp, ratio 5,11 kg/hp. Jazz e:HEV: 107 hp, ratio 11,18 kg/hp.
Focus ST 280: 264 km/h. Jazz e:HEV: 170 km/h.