Among the 5 city cars hybrid 2018–2022, the Jazz e:HEV ranks Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Hybrid 145), 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (9.8 s, behind the Toyota Yaris Hybrid).
Gen III · GENERATION 2020 → · CITY CAR
HondaHEV
Jazz e:HEV
107 hp, 9,8 s 0-100 : among the 5 city cars hybrid 2018–2022, the Jazz e:HEV ranks Combined consumption, 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
107hp
253 Nm · 109 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
9.8s
VMax 170 km/h
Cons.
4.5L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Honda Jazz e:HEV
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,498 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 109 hp |
| Combined power | 107 hp |
| Couple | 253 Nm |
| Gearbox | CVT 1 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.5 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,8 s |
| VMax | 170 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,694 mm |
| Height | 1,526 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,196 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 5 city cars hybrid, the Jazz e:HEV ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. Combined consumption (4.5 L/100), 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (9.8 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Hybrid 145 (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota Yaris Hybrid (1st with 9.7 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The Jazz e:HEV consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Hybrid 145 (4.5 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Jazz e:HEV stands against city cars hybrid
Comparison across 5 city cars hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption2e / 4
4.5 L/100
Min 5.8 L/100 · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDi 100 PS 48VMax 4.5 L/100 · Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Hybrid 145
0–100 km/h2e / 5
9,8 s
Min 11,4 s · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDi 100 PS 48VMax 9,7 s · Toyota Yaris Hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
208 Hybrid 110 e-DCS6110 hp · 0-100 9.8 s
Grande Panda 1.2 Hybrid 100101 hp · 0-100 11.0 s
i20 1.0 T-GDi 100 PS 48V101 hp · 0-100 11.4 s
i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48V101 hp · 0-100 11.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Honda Jazz e:HEV Gen III range
Generation Gen III launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the Gen III
Compare
Popular duels involving the Jazz e:HEV
Frequently asked questions
Honda Jazz e:HEV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Hybrid 145 leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Jazz e:HEV vs Renault Clio 5 E-Tech Hybrid 145 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.