Sur 0–100 km/h, Countryman E FWD gagne (7,28 s vs 7,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Countryman E FWD | e:Ny1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,28 s−0,48 s | 7,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,47 s−0,35 s | 15,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,65 s−0,76 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h+10 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,92 kg/hp | 8,34 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Countryman E FWD | e:Ny1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,13 s | 3,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,27 s | 5,87 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,28 s | 7,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,94 s | 10,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,32 s | 18,60 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,47 s | 15,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,65 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 330 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 945 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 677 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Countryman E FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.28 s versus 7.76 s for the e:Ny1. At this point, the Countryman E FWD leads by 0.48 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Countryman E FWD is doing 121 km/h against 122 km/h for the e:Ny1. The gap is 0.41 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Countryman E FWD crosses the line in 15.47 s versus 15.82 s. The 0.35 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Countryman E FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 162 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Countryman E FWD finishes in 28.65 s versus 29.40 s, with a 0.76 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (170 vs 160 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Countryman E FWD is capped at 170 km/h, the e:Ny1 at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.92 kg/hp vs 8.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.83 seconds. The 0.48 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Countryman E FWD gagne (7,28 s vs 7,76 s).
Countryman E FWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,28 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Countryman E FWD : 218 hp, ratio 8,92 kg/hp. e:Ny1 : 201 hp, ratio 8,34 kg/hp.
Countryman E FWD : 170 km/h. e:Ny1 : 160 km/h.