Sur 0–100 km/h, Jazz e:HEV gagne (9,90 s vs 10,28 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Jazz e:HEV | Cooper One FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 9,90 s−0,38 s | 10,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,09 s−0,60 s | 17,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,95 s−0,07 s | 32,02 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 185 km/h−15 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 11,18 kg/hp | 10,44 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Jazz e:HEV | Cooper One FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 2,91 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,30 s | 4,38 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,60 s | 7,45 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 9,90 s | 10,28 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 14,34 s | 14,19 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 34,79 s | 29,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,09 s | 17,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,95 s | 32,02 stight gap |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 185 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 107 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 253 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 196 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 102 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 180 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 065 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Jazz e:HEV hits 100 km/h in 9.90 s versus 10.28 s for the Cooper One FWD. At this point, the Jazz e:HEV leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Jazz e:HEV is doing 106 km/h against 109 km/h for the Cooper One FWD. The gap is 0.78 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Jazz e:HEV crosses the line in 17.08 s versus 17.69 s. The 0.61 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Jazz e:HEV maxes out at 170 km/h while the Cooper One FWD keeps accelerating towards 185 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.43 s from 0.61 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Jazz e:HEV finishes in 31.95 s versus 32.01 s, with just 0.07 s to spare. The Cooper One FWD fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 170 km/h, the Jazz e:HEV never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (11.18 kg/hp vs 10.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.33 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Jazz e:HEV gagne (9,90 s vs 10,28 s).
Jazz e:HEV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 9,90 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Jazz e:HEV : 107 hp, ratio 11,18 kg/hp. Cooper One FWD : 102 hp, ratio 10,44 kg/hp.
Jazz e:HEV : 170 km/h. Cooper One FWD : 185 km/h.