Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 3,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Performance | IONIQ 5 N | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s−0,41 s | 3,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s−0,47 s | 11,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s−0,75 s | 20,67 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h+2 km/h | 260 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Performance | IONIQ 5 N |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,02 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,48 s | 1,70 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 2,73 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s | 3,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 4,39 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,45 s | 7,16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,08 s | 11,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s | 11,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s | 20,67 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 260 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 478 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-stage reduction gearbox |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 3.46 s for the IONIQ 5 N. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 0.41 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Performance is doing 168 km/h against 164 km/h for the IONIQ 5 N. The gap is 0.35 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Performance crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 11.38 s. The 0.47 s gap represents roughly 26 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 226 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Performance finishes in 19.92 s versus 20.67 s, with a 0.75 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (262 vs 260 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Model X Performance and the IONIQ 5 N are governed to 262 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 4.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.96 seconds. The 0.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 3,46 s).
Model X Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model X Performance: 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. IONIQ 5 N: 478 hp, ratio 4,60 kg/hp.
Model X Performance: 262 km/h. IONIQ 5 N: 260 km/h.