NX2-N · GENERATION 2024 · FAMILY SUV
HyundaiBEV

IONIQ 5 N

478 hp, 448 km range, 3,5 s 0-100 : among the 18 D-SUV electric 2022–2026, the IONIQ 5 N ranks 16th of 18 in WLTP range, 13th of 14 in DC charge power, 2nd of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate66815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhRange →

Power

478hp

370 Nm · 478 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

3.5s

VMax 260 km/h

Range

448km

WLTP

DC charging

239kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications Hyundai IONIQ 5 N

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique478 hp
Combined power478 hp
Couple370 Nm
GearboxMono-rapport
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity84 kWh
Range WLTP448 km
Charge AC max11 kW
Charge DC max239 kW
Conso élec WLTP21.2 kWh/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,5 s
VMax260 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,715 mm
Wheelbase3,000 mm
Width1,940 mm
Height1,585 mm
Boot480 L
Kerb weight2,200 kg
Cd0.288
CO₂ WLTP0 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 18 D-SUV electric, the IONIQ 5 N ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. 2nd of 18 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s).

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 713 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 330 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 448 km WLTP (16th of 18 in WLTP range)

The IONIQ 5 N offers 448 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).

Charging: 239 kW DC (13th of 14 in DC charge power)

The IONIQ 5 N accepts up to 239 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (330 kW).

Segment positioning

Where the IONIQ 5 N stands against D-SUV electric

Comparison across 18 D-SUV electric marketed between 2022–2026.

WLTP range16e / 18
448 km
Min 400 km · BYD Tang EV AWD 380kWMax 713 km · Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology
DC charge power13e / 14
239 kW
Min 215 kW · Xpeng G6Max 330 kW · Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology
0–100 km/h2e / 18
3,5 s
Min 6,7 s · Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronMax 3,5 s · Kia EV6 GT AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the IONIQ 5 N

Frequently asked questions

Hyundai IONIQ 5 N: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 18 D-SUV electric 2022–2026, the IONIQ 5 N ranks 16th of 18 in WLTP range (448 km, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 13th of 14 in DC charge power (239 kW, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 2nd of 18 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s, behind the Kia EV6 GT AWD).

448 km WLTP announced - making it the 16th of 18 in autonomie du segment out of 18 models. The reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.