Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Duel›Jaguar E-PACE vs Renault Austral

Performance comparison

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

VS
RenaultPetrolFaster

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

200 hp · 300 Nm · 1,639 kg · 2022

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

E-PACE P200Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
0–100 km/h8,35 s8,29 s+0,06 s
400 m standing start16,19 s16,16 s+0,03 s
1,000 m standing start29,41 s28,80 s+0,61 s
Top speed (electronically limited)215 km/h+35 km/h180 km/h
Power-to-weight ratio8,74 kg/hp8,20 kg/hpbetter ratio

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultPetrolAustral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.

PalierE-PACE P200Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
0–30 km/h1,98 s2,32 s
0–50 km/h3,33 s3,87 s
0–80 km/h5,88 s6,21 s
0–100 km/h8,35 s8,29 stight gap
0–120 km/h11,44 s10,88 s
0–160 km/h21,17 s18,55 s
0–200 km/h45,14 s—
400 m standing start16,19 s16,16 stight gap
1,000 m standing start29,41 s28,80 s
Top speed215 km/h180 km/h

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpcompensated by −109 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainE-PACE P200 2018
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF
Renault

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

8,20kg/hpratio better by 0,54 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpInline-3 Turbo E-Tech (H5F 130)
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 639 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxMulti-mode automatic (E-Tech)

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 hits 100 km/h in 8.29 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The 0.06 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the E-PACE P200 is doing 115 km/h against 120 km/h for the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 crosses the line in 16.16 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.03 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 168 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 finishes in 28.80 s versus 29.41 s, with a 0.61 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (215 km/h), the E-PACE P200 never recovers its launch deficit.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 8.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of E-PACE P200
Bmw X3 xDrive30iPorsche MacanSEAT Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG
Instead of Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
Bmw X3 xDrive30iPorsche MacanSEAT Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG

Autres duels qui pourraient vous intéresser

BmwVSJaguar

X1 sDrive20d vs E-PACE P200

BmwVSJaguar

X1 xDrive20i vs E-PACE P200

BmwVSJaguar

X2 sDrive18i vs E-PACE P200

BMWVSRenault

iX M60 vs Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Frequently asked questions

Sur 0–100 km/h, Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 gagne (8,29 s vs 8,35 s).

E-PACE P200 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).

E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,20 kg/hp.

E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h. Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 : 180 km/h.