Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE SVR wins (4,35 s vs 8,31 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | Terramar | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s−3,96 s | 8,31 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−3,95 s | 16,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s−7,35 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+71 km/h | 214 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | Terramar |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 6,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 8,31 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 11,46 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 20,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | 45,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 16,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 214 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 810 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the F-PACE SVR hits 100 km/h in 4.35 s versus 8.31 s for the Terramar. Despite lacking instant torque, 550 hp of power compensates. At this point, the F-PACE SVR leads by 3.96 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-PACE SVR is doing 154 km/h against 116 km/h for the Terramar. The gap is 2.55 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE SVR crosses the line in 12.30 s versus 16.25 s. The 3.95 s gap represents roughly 148 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE SVR continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE SVR finishes in 22.05 s versus 29.41 s, with a 7.36 s lead.
Electronically capped at 285 km/h, the F-PACE SVR never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.30 seconds. The 3.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE SVR wins (4,35 s vs 8,31 s).
F-PACE SVR goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-PACE SVR: 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. Terramar: 201 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR: 285 km/h. Terramar: 214 km/h.