Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo E3.1 gagne (3,87 s vs 4,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | Cayenne Turbo E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 3,87 s+0,48 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,06 s+0,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s−0,09 s | 22,15 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h | 285 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | Cayenne Turbo E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 0,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 1,64 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 2,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 3,87 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 5,14 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 8,78 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | 14,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 22,15 stight gap |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 285 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-PACE SVR 2021 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo hits 100 km/h in 3.87 s versus 4.35 s for the F-PACE SVR. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo leads by 0.48 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo is doing 151 km/h against 154 km/h for the F-PACE SVR. The gap is 0.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo crosses the line in 12.06 s versus 12.30 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 285 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed — the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 285 km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE SVR finishes in 22.05 s versus 22.14 s. The 0.09 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the F-PACE SVR and the Cayenne Turbo are governed to 285 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.68 kg/hp vs 3.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.20 seconds. The 0.48 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo E3.1 gagne (3,87 s vs 4,35 s).
F-PACE SVR passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-PACE SVR : 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. Cayenne Turbo E3.1 : 550 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR : 285 km/h. Cayenne Turbo E3.1 : 285 km/h.