Porsche Cayenne Turbo

Petrollarge SUVGENERATION E3.1, 2019

550 hp, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 22 in Top speed, 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
550 hp
770 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.8 s
VMax 285 km/h
Cons.
13.6 L
/100 km
Tank
23.7 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo
Displacement
3,996 cm³
ICE power
549 hp
Combined power
550 hp
Combined torque
770 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
13.6 L/100 km
Tank
23.7 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
3,8 s
VMax
285 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,925 mm
Wheelbase
2,893 mm
Width
1,981 mm
Height
1,671 mm
Boot
26 L
Kerb weight
2,175 kg
Cd
0.35

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (285 km/h), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (253 hp/t). 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (285 km/h), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (253 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,6 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW X5 M Competition (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.8 s 0-100 (4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference BMW X5 M Competition (3.8 s).

Top speed: 285 km/h (2nd of 22 in Top speed)

Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Where the Cayenne Turbo stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.
0–100 km/h4e / 22
3,8 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · BMW X5 M Competition
Top speed2e / 22
285 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Power-to-weight3e / 22
253 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 269 hp/t · BMW X6 M Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range

Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the E3.1

Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo

Continue with the Porsche Cayenne Turbo

The same car, from other angles.

Porsche Cayenne Turbo: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Cayenne Turbo rank in its segment?

Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the BMW X5 M Competition), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (253 hp/t, behind the BMW X6 M Competition).

How much does the Cayenne Turbo cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW X5 M Competition instead?

The BMW X5 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 3.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Turbo vs BMW X5 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.