Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the Bmw X5 M Competition), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (253 hp/t, behind the Bmw X6 M Competition).
E3.1 · GENERATION 2019 → · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE
Cayenne Turbo
550 hp, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 22 in Top speed, 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
550hp
770 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.8s
VMax 285 km/h
Cons.
13.6L
/100 km
Tank
23.7L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,996 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 549 hp |
| Combined power | 550 hp |
| Combined torque | 770 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 13.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 23.7 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,8 s |
| VMax | 285 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,925 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,893 mm |
| Width | 1,981 mm |
| Height | 1,671 mm |
| Boot | 26 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,175 kg |
| Cd | 0.35 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (285 km/h), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (253 hp/t). 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (285 km/h), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (253 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,6 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X5 M Competition (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.8 s 0-100 (4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 4th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Bmw X5 M Competition (3.8 s).
Top speed: 285 km/h (2nd of 22 in Top speed)
Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne Turbo stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.
0–100 km/h4e / 22
3,8 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · Bmw X5 M Competition
Top speed2e / 22
285 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Power-to-weight3e / 22
253 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 269 hp/t · Bmw X6 M Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X5 M50i530 hp · 0-100 4.3 s
X5 M50i530 hp · 0-100 4.3 s
X6 M50i530 hp · 0-100 4.3 s
SQ7 SUV507 hp · 0-100 4.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range
Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the E3.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X5 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 3.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Turbo vs Bmw X5 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.