Sur 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 gagne (3,83 s vs 3,87 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M Competition G05 | Cayenne Turbo E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−0,04 s | 3,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,95 s−0,11 s | 12,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,80 s−0,35 s | 22,15 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 285 km/h−35 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M Competition G05 | Cayenne Turbo E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 0,98 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,73 s | 1,64 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,90 s | 2,80 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,87 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,02 s | 5,14 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,23 s | 8,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,32 s | 14,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,95 s | 12,06 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,80 s | 22,15 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 285 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 335 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Bmw X5 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 3.87 s for the Cayenne Turbo. The 0.04 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition is doing 155 km/h against 151 km/h for the Cayenne Turbo. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X5 M Competition crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 12.06 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition finishes in 21.80 s versus 22.14 s, with a 0.35 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (285 km/h), the Cayenne Turbo never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X5 M Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne Turbo at 285 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.74 kg/hp vs 3.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.97 seconds. The 0.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 gagne (3,83 s vs 3,87 s).
X5 M Competition G05 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X5 M Competition G05 : 625 hp, ratio 3,74 kg/hp. Cayenne Turbo E3.1 : 550 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp.
X5 M Competition G05 : 250 km/h. Cayenne Turbo E3.1 : 285 km/h.