Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 7,72 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE P300 | A5 Avant | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−2,09 s | 7,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s−2,02 s | 15,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s−3,59 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+5 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,38 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE P300 | A5 Avant |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,61 s | 2,12 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,69 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,30 s | 5,76 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 7,72 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,17 s | 10,23 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,54 s | 17,35 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,21 s | 29,43 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s | 15,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 710 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 7.72 s for the A5 Avant. At this point, the F-TYPE P300 leads by 2.09 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE P300 is doing 140 km/h against 122 km/h for the A5 Avant. The gap is 1.33 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 15.70 s. The 2.01 s gap represents roughly 82 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 27.94 s, with a 3.59 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE P300 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the A5 Avant at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.32 kg/hp vs 8.38 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.72 seconds. The 2.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 7,72 s).
F-TYPE P300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp. A5 Avant: 204 hp, ratio 8,38 kg/hp.
F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h. A5 Avant: 245 km/h.