Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 6,47 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | F-TYPE P300 | 530i G30 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.63 s | 6.47 s | 0.84 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.69 s | 14.61 s | 0.92 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.35 s | 26.10 s | 1.75 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.32 kg/hp | 6.45 kg/hp | better ratio · F-TYPE P300 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | F-TYPE P300 | 530i G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.61 s | 1.77 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.69 s | 2.94 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.30 s | 4.83 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.63 s | 6.47 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.17 s | 8.55 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.54 s | 14.25 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18.21 s | 23.22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13.69 s | 14.61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.35 s | 26.10 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 625 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 6.47 s for the 530i. At this point, the F-TYPE P300 leads by 0.84 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE P300 is doing 140 km/h against 130 km/h for the 530i. The gap is 0.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 14.61 s. The 0.92 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 183 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 26.09 s, with a 1.74 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the F-TYPE P300 and the 530i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.32 kg/hp vs 6.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.76 seconds. The 0.84 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 6,47 s).
F-TYPE P300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp. 530i G30: 252 hp, ratio 6,45 kg/hp.
F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h. 530i G30: 250 km/h.