Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 gagne (4,81 s vs 4,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| I-PACE EV400 | X4 M40d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,83 s | 4,81 s+0,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,19 s | 13,13 s+0,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,36 s | 24,04 s+0,32 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 250 km/h−50 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,52 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | I-PACE EV400 | X4 M40d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,18 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 1,93 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,62 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,83 s | 4,81 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,40 s | 6,53 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,23 s | 11,29 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,88 s | 18,75 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 13,19 s | 13,13 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,36 s | 24,04 s |
| Top speed limited | 200 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 696 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 208 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.81 s versus 4.84 s for the I-PACE EV400. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d is doing 139 km/h against 141 km/h for the I-PACE EV400. The gap is 0.09 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M40d crosses the line in 13.13 s versus 13.18 s. The 0.05 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 193 km/h versus 192 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d finishes in 24.04 s versus 24.36 s, with a 0.32 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the I-PACE EV400 is capped at 200 km/h, the Bmw X4 M40d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.54 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 gagne (4,81 s vs 4,83 s).
I-PACE EV400 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
I-PACE EV400 : 400 hp, ratio 5,52 kg/hp. X4 M40d G02 : 340 hp, ratio 5,94 kg/hp.
I-PACE EV400 : 200 km/h. X4 M40d G02 : 250 km/h.