Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 10,21 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Compass 4xe | Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,58 s−2,63 s | 10,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,62 s−1,94 s | 17,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,88 s−3,11 s | 31,99 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+7 km/h | 193 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,55 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Compass 4xe | Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 2,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,72 s | 3,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,25 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,58 s | 10,21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,77 s | 14,68 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,78 s | 29,72 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 50,50 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,62 s | 17,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,88 s | 31,99 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 193 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 582 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Compass 4xe hits 100 km/h in 7.58 s versus 10.21 s for the Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Compass 4xe leads by 2.63 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Compass 4xe is doing 116 km/h against 105 km/h for the Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150. The gap is 1.39 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Compass 4xe crosses the line in 15.62 s versus 17.56 s. The 1.94 s gap represents roughly 69 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Compass 4xe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 147 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Compass 4xe finishes in 28.87 s versus 31.98 s, with a 3.11 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 193 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the Compass 4xe never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.26 seconds. The 2.63 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 10,21 s).
Compass 4xe goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,58 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Compass 4xe: 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp. Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,55 kg/hp.
Compass 4xe: 200 km/h. Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150: 193 km/h.