Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Duel›Kia EV6 vs Renault Scenic

Performance comparison

KIA EV6 AWD Long Range vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

KiaBEVFaster

EV6 AWD Long Range

325 hp · 605 Nm · 2,185 kg · 2023

VS
RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

170 hp · 300 Nm · 1,777 kg · 2024

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

EV6 AWD Long RangeScenic E-Tech Electric 170
0–100 km/h5,16 s−3,02 s8,18 s
400 m standing start13,61 s−2,51 s16,12 s
1,000 m standing start25,55 s−4,25 s29,80 s
Top speed (electronically limited)185 km/h211 km/h−26 km/h
Power-to-weight ratio6,72 kg/hpbetter ratio10,45 kg/hp

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

KiaBEVEV6 AWD Long Range
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultBEVScenic E-Tech Electric 170
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.

PalierEV6 AWD Long RangeScenic E-Tech Electric 170
0–30 km/h1,33 s1,90 s
0–50 km/h2,23 s3,17 s
0–80 km/h3,75 s5,71 s
0–100 km/h5,16 s8,18 s
0–120 km/h6,98 s11,49 s
0–160 km/h12,89 s23,49 s
0–200 km/h-58,58 s
400 m standing start13,61 s16,12 s
1,000 m standing start25,55 s29,80 s
Top speed185 km/h211 km/h

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Kia

EV6 AWD Long Range

6,72kg/hpratio better by 3,73 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power325 hpPending
Torque605 Nm
Weight2 185 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Renault

Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

10,45kg/hpcompensated by −408 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power170 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 777 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the EV6 AWD Long Range hits 100 km/h in 5.16 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. At this point, the EV6 AWD Long Range leads by 3.02 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the EV6 AWD Long Range is doing 135 km/h against 115 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The gap is 1.67 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the EV6 AWD Long Range crosses the line in 13.61 s versus 16.11 s. The 2.51 s gap represents roughly 94 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the EV6 AWD Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 183 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the EV6 AWD Long Range finishes in 25.54 s versus 29.80 s, with a 4.26 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (211 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 never recovers its launch deficit.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The EV6 AWD Long Range features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 185 km/h, the EV6 AWD Long Range never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.72 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 3.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of EV6 AWD Long Range
Volkswagen ID.4 GTXFord Mustang Mach-E RWDVolkswagen ID.5 GTX
Instead of Scenic E-Tech Electric 170
Nissan Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218Toyota bZ4X AWDPeugeot E-3008 210

Autres duels qui pourraient vous intéresser

KiaVSAudi

EV6 AWD Long Range vs Q6 Sportback e-tron

AudiVSRenault

Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

KiaVSAudi

EV6 AWD Long Range vs Q6 SUV e-tron

AudiVSRenault

Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, EV6 AWD Long Range wins (5,16 s vs 8,18 s).

EV6 AWD Long Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,16 seconds (calibrated simulation).

EV6 AWD Long Range: 325 hp, ratio 6,72 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.

EV6 AWD Long Range: 185 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 211 km/h.