Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD wins (6,04 s vs 8,18 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Mustang Mach-E RWD | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s−2,14 s | 8,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s−1,73 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s−3,06 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 211 km/h−31 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,01 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Mustang Mach-E RWD | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,57 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,63 s | 3,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,39 s | 5,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 8,18 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,18 s | 11,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,98 s | 23,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 58,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 211 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 886 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 777 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E RWD leads by 2.14 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD is doing 129 km/h against 115 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E RWD crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 16.11 s. The 1.72 s gap represents roughly 65 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD finishes in 26.73 s versus 29.80 s, with a 3.07 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (211 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Mustang Mach-E RWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.01 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 2.14 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD wins (6,04 s vs 8,18 s).
Mustang Mach-E RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Mustang Mach-E RWD: 269 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Mustang Mach-E RWD: 180 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 211 km/h.