Over 0–100 km/h, A 250 W177 wins (6,26 s vs 6,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A 250 W177 | Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,26 s−0,39 s | 6,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s−0,37 s | 14,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,56 s−1,15 s | 26,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+19 km/h | 231 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,47 kg/hp | 5,64 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A 250 W177 | Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,96 s | 1,73 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,04 s | 2,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,70 s | 4,74 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,26 s | 6,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,08 s | 8,67 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,25 s | 15,01 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,39 s | 27,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s | 14,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,56 s | 26,71 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 231 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7G-DCT dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
Off the line, the A 250 hits 100 km/h in 6.26 s versus 6.65 s for the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220. Despite the faster sprint time, the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the A 250 is doing 134 km/h against 127 km/h for the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220. The gap is 0.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A 250 crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 14.76 s. The 0.37 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A 250 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A 250 finishes in 25.56 s versus 26.71 s, with a 1.15 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the A 250 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.47 kg/hp vs 5.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.16 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, A 250 W177 wins (6,26 s vs 6,65 s).
A 250 W177 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,26 seconds (calibrated simulation).
A 250 W177: 224 hp, ratio 6,47 kg/hp. Clio 4 RS Trophy 220: 220 hp, ratio 5,64 kg/hp.
A 250 W177: 250 km/h. Clio 4 RS Trophy 220: 231 km/h.