Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 220 Saloon wins (7,31 s vs 7,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| CLA 220 Saloon | 320e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,31 s−0,15 s | 7,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,32 s−0,12 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,54 s−1,23 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+25 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,08 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | CLA 220 Saloon | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,78 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,00 s | 2,37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,21 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,31 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,81 s | 10,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,96 s | 20,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,48 s | 46,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,32 s | 15,44 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,54 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 380 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 705 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the CLA 220 Saloon hits 100 km/h in 7.31 s versus 7.46 s for the Bmw 320e. Despite lacking instant torque, 211 hp of power compensates. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 320e is 10 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320e is doing 115 km/h against 122 km/h for the CLA 220 Saloon. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the CLA 220 Saloon crosses the line in 15.32 s versus 15.43 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the CLA 220 Saloon continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 171 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the CLA 220 Saloon finishes in 27.53 s versus 28.77 s, with a 1.23 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the CLA 220 Saloon is capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 320e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 0.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 220 Saloon wins (7,31 s vs 7,46 s).
CLA 220 Saloon goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,31 seconds (calibrated simulation).
CLA 220 Saloon: 211 hp, ratio 8,08 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
CLA 220 Saloon: 240 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.