Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
ACLAvsBP7BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsCLA · P7

Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie vs Xpeng P7: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact · 2025 vs 2020 · Methodology
MercedesBEVFaster

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie

354 hp · 515 Nm · 2,135 kg · 2025

VS
XpengBEV

P7

263 hp · 390 Nm · 1,995 kg · 2020

Result · 0–100 km/h

AMercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie

4.95 s

Gap1.63 sin favour of CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
BXpeng P7

6.58 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureCLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ TechnologieP7Gap
0–100 km/h4.95 s6.58 s1.63 s · CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
400 m standing start13.32 s14.81 s1.49 s · CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
1,000 m standing start24.37 s27.64 s3.27 s · CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
Top speed (electronically limited)210 km/h170 km/h40 km/h · CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
Power-to-weight ratio6.03 kg/hp7.59 kg/hpbetter ratio · CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

MercedesBEVCLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
XpengBEVP7
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageCLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ TechnologieP7
0–30 km/h1.31 s1.75 s
0–50 km/h2.19 s2.93 s
0–80 km/h3.63 s4.84 s
0–100 km/h4.95 s6.58 s
0–120 km/h6.61 s8.81 s
0–160 km/h11.72 s15.66 s
0–200 km/h19.43 s-
400 m standing start13.32 s14.81 s
1,000 m standing start24.37 s27.64 s
Top speed210 km/h170 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Mercedes

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie

6,03kg/hpratio better by 1,55 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power354 hpPending
Torque515 Nm
Weight2 135 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
Xpeng

P7

7,59kg/hpcompensated by −140 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power263 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque390 Nm
Weight1 995 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie hits 100 km/h in 4.95 s versus 6.58 s for the P7. At this point, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie leads by 1.63 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie is doing 139 km/h against 127 km/h for the P7. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie crosses the line in 13.32 s versus 14.81 s. The 1.49 s gap represents roughly 63 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie finishes in 24.37 s versus 27.64 s, with a 3.27 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the P7’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie is capped at 210 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.03 kg/hp vs 7.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.18 seconds. The 1.63 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
BMW i4 eDrive35Tesla Model 3 RWDTesla Model 3 Long Range RWD
Instead of P7
Xpeng MONA M03

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSRenault

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie vs Megane E-Tech Electric

XpengVSTesla

P7 vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

MercedesVSRenault

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie vs Megane E-Tech Electric 217

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 RWD vs P7

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie wins (4,95 s vs 6,58 s).

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,95 seconds (calibrated simulation).

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie: 354 hp, ratio 6,03 kg/hp. P7: 263 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp.

CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie: 210 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.