Over 0–100 km/h, E 400 e 4MATIC W214 wins (5,30 s vs 5,49 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | 740e iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s−0,19 s | 5,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s−0,12 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s−0,32 s | 24,90 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,89 kg/hp | 5,83 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | 740e iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,36 s | 1,27 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,12 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 3,79 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 5,49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 7,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,19 s | 12,61 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 20,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 13,69 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 24,90 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the E 400 e 4MATIC hits 100 km/h in 5.31 s versus 5.49 s for the Bmw 740e iPerformance. The 0.19 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC is doing 135 km/h against 133 km/h for the Bmw 740e iPerformance. The gap is 0.06 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the E 400 e 4MATIC crosses the line in 13.57 s versus 13.68 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 187 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC finishes in 24.58 s versus 24.90 s, with a 0.32 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the E 400 e 4MATIC and the Bmw 740e iPerformance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.89 kg/hp vs 5.83 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.52 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, E 400 e 4MATIC W214 wins (5,30 s vs 5,49 s).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 381 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp. 740e iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,83 kg/hp.
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 250 km/h. 740e iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.