Over 0–100 km/h, E 400 e 4MATIC W214 wins (5,30 s vs 5,68 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | Focus ST 280 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s−0,38 s | 5,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s−0,23 s | 13,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s−0,06 s | 24,64 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 264 km/h−14 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,89 kg/hp | 5,11 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | Focus ST 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,36 s | 1,66 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,77 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 4,37 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 5,68 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 7,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,19 s | 11,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 19,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 13,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 24,64 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 431 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the E 400 e 4MATIC hits 100 km/h in 5.31 s versus 5.68 s for the Focus ST 280. The instant torque of 650 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the E 400 e 4MATIC leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC is doing 135 km/h against 139 km/h for the Focus ST 280. The gap is 0.37 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the E 400 e 4MATIC crosses the line in 13.57 s versus 13.79 s. The 0.23 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The E 400 e 4MATIC maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the Focus ST 280 keeps accelerating towards 264 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.13 s from 0.23 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC finishes in 24.58 s versus 24.63 s, with just 0.06 s to spare. The Focus ST 280 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the E 400 e 4MATIC never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.31 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, E 400 e 4MATIC W214 wins (5,30 s vs 5,68 s).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 381 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp. Focus ST 280: 280 hp, ratio 5,11 kg/hp.
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 250 km/h. Focus ST 280: 264 km/h.