Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,55 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| EQS 450 V297 | 525d G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s−0,25 s | 6,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−0,17 s | 14,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s−0,01 s | 26,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 250 km/h−40 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,45 kg/hp | 6,90 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | EQS 450 V297 | 525d G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,87 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,71 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,57 s | 4,85 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,51 s | 8,70 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,04 s | 14,72 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,02 s | 24,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 14,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s | 26,39 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 210 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the EQS 450 hits 100 km/h in 6.30 s versus 6.55 s for the Bmw 525d. The instant torque of 568 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the EQS 450 leads by 0.25 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the EQS 450 is doing 128 km/h against 129 km/h for the Bmw 525d. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the EQS 450 crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 14.73 s. The 0.17 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The EQS 450 maxes out at 210 km/h while the Bmw 525d keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.10 s.
At 1,000 metres, the EQS 450 finishes in 26.37 s versus 26.39 s, with just 0.02 s to spare. The Bmw 525d fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the EQS 450 is capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw 525d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.96 seconds. The 0.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,55 s).
EQS 450 V297 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
EQS 450 V297: 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp. 525d G30: 231 hp, ratio 6,90 kg/hp.
EQS 450 V297: 210 km/h. 525d G30: 250 km/h.