Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 F82 gagne (4,24 s vs 4,53 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Maybach S 680 | M4 F82 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,53 s | 4,24 s+0,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,41 s | 12,38 s+0,03 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,93 s−0,36 s | 22,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,86 kg/hp | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Maybach S 680 | M4 F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,14 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,13 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 3,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,53 s | 4,24 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,67 s | 5,70 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,89 s | 9,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,34 s | 14,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,41 s | 12,38 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,93 s | 22,29 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 900 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 365 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.24 s versus 4.53 s for the Maybach S 680. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 0.29 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 151 km/h against 153 km/h for the Maybach S 680. The gap is 0.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.38 s versus 12.41 s. The 0.03 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed — the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the Maybach S 680 finishes in 21.93 s versus 22.29 s. The 0.36 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Maybach S 680 and the Bmw M4 are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.86 kg/hp vs 3.54 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.44 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 F82 gagne (4,24 s vs 4,53 s).
Maybach S 680 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,53 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Maybach S 680 : 612 hp, ratio 3,86 kg/hp. M4 F82 : 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp.
Maybach S 680 : 250 km/h. M4 F82 : 250 km/h.