Maybach S 680
612 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 3 limousines 2023–2027, the Maybach S 680 ranks 0–100 km/h, Top speed, Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
612hp
900 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.5s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
14.2L
/100 km
Tank
76L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes Maybach S 680
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 5,980 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 612 hp |
| Couple | 900 Nm |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 14,2 L/100km |
| Tank | 76 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,5 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,469 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,396 mm |
| Width | 1,921 mm |
| Height | 1,510 mm |
| Boot | 495 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,365 kg |
| CO₂ WLTP | 323 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 3 limousines, the Maybach S 680 ranks in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: Top speed (250 km/h), Power-to-weight (259 hp/t). Top speed (250 km/h), Power-to-weight (259 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi S8 (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Maybach S 680 ranks 0–100 km/h, 0.7 s off the reference Audi S8 (3.8 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Maybach S 680 stands against limousines
Comparison across 3 limousines marketed between 2023–2027.
0–100 km/h
2eout of 3
Top speed
1eout of 3
Power-to-weight
1eout of 3
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
M8 Competition Coupe
625 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
M8 Competition Gran Coupe
625 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
M8 Competition Convertible
625 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Panamera Turbo S Executive
630 hp · 0-100 3.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes Maybach range
Other versions
Compare
Popular duels involving the Maybach S 680
Take the next step
Find a Maybach S 680 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes Maybach S 680: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 3 limousines 2023–2027, the Maybach S 680 ranks 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Audi S8), Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Mercedes Maybach S 680), Power-to-weight (259 hp/t, behind the Mercedes Maybach S 680).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi S8 leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Maybach S 680 vs Audi S8 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.