Among the 3 limousines 2023–2027, the Maybach S 680 ranks 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Audi S8), Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Mercedes Maybach S 680), Power-to-weight (259 hp/t, behind the Mercedes Maybach S 680).
2025 · GENERATION 2025 → · LIMOUSINE
MercedesICE
Maybach S 680
612 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 3 limousines 2023–2027, the Maybach S 680 ranks 0–100 km/h, Top speed, Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
612hp
900 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.5s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
14.2L
/100 km
Tank
76L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes Maybach S 680
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 5,980 cm³ |
| Power | 612 hp |
| Couple | 900 Nm |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 14.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 76 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,5 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,469 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,396 mm |
| Width | 1,921 mm |
| Height | 1,510 mm |
| Boot | 495 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,365 kg |
| CO₂ WLTP | 323 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 3 limousines, the Maybach S 680 ranks in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: Top speed (250 km/h), Power-to-weight (259 hp/t). Top speed (250 km/h), Power-to-weight (259 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi S8 (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Maybach S 680 ranks 0–100 km/h, 0.7 s off the reference Audi S8 (3.8 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Maybach S 680 stands against limousines
Comparison across 3 limousines marketed between 2023–2027.
0–100 km/h2e / 3
4,5 s
Min 4,5 s · Mercedes Maybach S 680Max 3,8 s · Audi S8
Top speed1e / 3
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Audi S8Max 250 km/h · Mercedes Maybach S 680
Power-to-weight1e / 3
259 hp/t
Min 257 hp/t · Audi S8Max 259 hp/t · Mercedes Maybach S 680
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
M8 Competition Convertible625 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
M8 Competition Coupe625 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
M8 Competition Gran Coupe625 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
Panamera Turbo S630 hp · 0-100 3.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes Maybach range
Other versions
Compare
Popular duels involving the Maybach S 680
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes Maybach S 680: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi S8 leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Maybach S 680 vs Audi S8 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.