Over 0–100 km/h, 320e G20 wins (7,46 s vs 8,32 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| V 300 d 4MATIC | 320e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 7,46 s+0,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 15,44 s+0,59 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 28,77 s+0,79 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 215 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,44 kg/hp | 8,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | V 300 d 4MATIC | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,60 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,77 s | 2,37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,51 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,54 s | 10,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,22 s | 20,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 51,69 s | 46,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 312 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the 320e hits 100 km/h in 7.46 s versus 8.32 s for the V 300 d 4MATIC. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the 320e leads by 0.86 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 320e is doing 115 km/h against 114 km/h for the V 300 d 4MATIC. The gap is 0.47 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 320e crosses the line in 15.43 s versus 16.03 s. The 0.59 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 320e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 158 km/h versus 156 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 320e finishes in 28.77 s versus 29.55 s, with a 0.79 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (210 vs 215 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the V 300 d 4MATIC is capped at 217 km/h, the 320e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.08 seconds. The 0.86 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320e G20 wins (7,46 s vs 8,32 s).
V 300 d 4MATIC goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,32 seconds (calibrated simulation).
V 300 d 4MATIC: 245 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
V 300 d 4MATIC: 210 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.