Sur 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro gagne (7,35 s vs 8,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| ID.3 Pro | e-208 156 Phase 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,35 s−0,77 s | 8,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,50 s−0,64 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,13 s−1,44 s | 30,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h+10 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,82 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,33 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | ID.3 Pro | e-208 156 Phase 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,31 s | 6,03 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,35 s | 8,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,01 s | 10,92 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,97 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,50 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,13 s | 30,57 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 800 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Synchrone a aimants permanents 115 kW |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 455 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.3 Pro hits 100 km/h in 7.35 s versus 8.12 s for the e-208 156 Phase 2. At this point, the ID.3 Pro leads by 0.77 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.3 Pro is doing 121 km/h against 119 km/h for the e-208 156 Phase 2. The gap is 0.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.3 Pro crosses the line in 15.50 s versus 16.14 s. The 0.64 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the ID.3 Pro continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the ID.3 Pro finishes in 29.13 s versus 30.57 s, with a 1.44 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the ID.3 Pro is capped at 160 km/h, the e-208 156 Phase 2 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.82 kg/hp vs 9.33 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.76 seconds. The 0.77 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro gagne (7,35 s vs 8,12 s).
ID.3 Pro passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
ID.3 Pro : 204 hp, ratio 8,82 kg/hp. e-208 156 Phase 2 : 156 hp, ratio 9,33 kg/hp.
ID.3 Pro : 160 km/h. e-208 156 Phase 2 : 150 km/h.