Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro wins (7,35 s vs 8,12 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | ID.3 Pro | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7.35 s | 8.12 s | 0.77 s · ID.3 Pro |
| 400 m standing start | 15.50 s | 16.14 s | 0.64 s · ID.3 Pro |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.13 s | 30.62 s | 1.49 s · ID.3 Pro |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 150 km/h | 10 km/h · ID.3 Pro |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8.82 kg/hp | 10.16 kg/hp | better ratio · ID.3 Pro |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | ID.3 Pro | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.88 s | 2.07 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.15 s | 3.46 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.31 s | 5.85 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.35 s | 8.12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.01 s | 11.18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.97 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15.50 s | 16.14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.13 s | 30.62 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 800 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.3 Pro hits 100 km/h in 7.35 s versus 8.12 s for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. At this point, the ID.3 Pro leads by 0.77 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.3 Pro is doing 121 km/h against 117 km/h for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. The gap is 0.42 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.3 Pro crosses the line in 15.50 s versus 16.13 s. The 0.64 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the ID.3 Pro continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the ID.3 Pro finishes in 29.13 s versus 30.62 s, with a 1.49 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the ID.3 Pro is capped at 160 km/h, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.82 kg/hp vs 10.16 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.23 seconds. The 0.77 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro wins (7,35 s vs 8,12 s).
ID.3 Pro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
ID.3 Pro: 204 hp, ratio 8,82 kg/hp. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp.
ID.3 Pro: 160 km/h. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 km/h.